Posted: December 31, 2024
Updated: [insert update time]
As we close out the year, a significant development has taken place in the realm of tech regulation. Late Tuesday evening, a federal judge blocked NetChoice’s challenge to California’s recently enacted law, SB 976, which prohibits companies from serving "addictive feeds" to minors without explicit parental consent.
The Impact of the Decision
Beginning Wednesday, technology companies will be prohibited from serving an addictive feed to a California-based user they know to be a minor, except with explicit parental consent. This means that companies like Meta, Google, and X (formerly Twitter) must adapt their algorithms to ensure compliance with the new law.
What are Addictive Feeds?
SB 976 defines an addictive feed as an algorithm that selects and recommends content for users based on their behavior, rather than their explicit preferences. In essence, an addictive feed is one that exploits a user’s interests and creates a cycle of engagement, often without their conscious awareness.
The Role of Age Assurance Techniques
From January 2027 onward, companies will be required to use age assurance techniques, such as age estimation models, to determine whether a user is a minor. This means that companies must implement robust measures to verify a user’s age and adjust their feed accordingly.
NetChoice’s Challenge: A Threat to Tech Lobbying
In November, NetChoice sued to enjoin SB 976 in its entirety, arguing that the law violated the First Amendment. The judge denied the motion for an injunction but blocked other elements of the law, including a restriction on nighttime notifications for minors.
New York’s Similar Legislation
Notably, New York passed similar legislation in June, highlighting a growing trend towards regulating addictive feeds and protecting minors from exploitation by technology companies.
The Implications of This Decision
This decision marks a significant turning point in tech regulation. As governments continue to scrutinize the impact of social media on society, we can expect more laws like SB 976 to emerge. The tech industry must adapt to these changing regulations or risk facing severe consequences.
What’s Next for Tech Companies?
In response to this development, technology companies will need to reassess their approaches to addictive feeds and implement robust age assurance measures. This may involve investing in new technologies, revising algorithms, and developing new business models that prioritize user well-being.
Conclusion
The decision by the federal judge to allow California’s ban on addictive feeds for minors to go into effect marks a significant milestone in tech regulation. As we move forward in 2025, it will be crucial for technology companies to adapt to these changing regulations and prioritize user safety above profits.
Stay Informed with TechCrunch
To stay up-to-date on the latest developments in tech regulation, including California’s ban on addictive feeds for minors, subscribe to our newsletter or follow us on social media. Our experts provide daily insights into the fast-paced world of technology.
Key Takeaways:
- The federal judge blocked NetChoice’s challenge to California’s SB 976 law.
- Beginning Wednesday, companies must obtain explicit parental consent before serving addictive feeds to minors in California.
- From January 2027 onward, companies will be required to use age assurance techniques to determine whether a user is a minor.
Related Topics:
- Addictive feeds
- AI (Artificial Intelligence)
- Apps (Application Development)
- Ban on addictive feeds for minors in California
- Judge’s decision
- Law (Regulation of Technology)
- NetChoice
Subscribe to Our Newsletters:
- TechCrunch Daily News: Get the industry’s biggest tech news every weekday and Sunday.
- TechCrunch AI: Stay ahead of the curve with the latest news in artificial intelligence.
- Startups Weekly: Dive into the world of startups with our weekly newsletter.
